You Don't Need to Quit Your Job to Make
Steph Smith's February 2019 essay (read by over 80,000 people) pushes back on the popular myth that you must quit your job to build something meaningful. Drawing on Adam Grant's Originals — "originality requires extreme risk-taking" is exactly what Grant disproves — Smith argues successful makers are usually expert risk-mitigators, not risk-maximisers. The piece walks through three concepts: rethinking "I don't have time," the underrated benefits of keeping the day job, and improvements to how you think about the box you're inside.
Opens on blog.stephsmith.io · Curated by GlobeRead
GlobeRead's Take
Indie-maker culture and startup culture share a peculiar founding myth: the quitting-the-job story. The brave protagonist gives notice, eats ramen, ships at 4 a.m., and the world either rewards them or doesn't. The shape of the story is so dominant that anyone who hasn't quit can feel they're not really trying. Smith's piece is interesting because she did the opposite — kept a demanding day job, made things on the side, and ended up further along than most of the people who jumped — and she's willing to say so plainly.nnThe central reframe comes via Adam Grant's Originals: "originality requires extreme risk taking" is not the conclusion of Grant's research, it is the myth his research dismantles. The successful entrepreneurs Grant studied were disproportionately the ones who kept their day jobs while building, who diversified rather than concentrated their risk, and who removed downside before chasing upside. Smith extends the observation: the maker mythology of total commitment isn't just statistically false, it actively selects against the patient compounding that produces the best long-term outcomes.nnThe second hinge is the assault on "I don't have time." The average American works about 8.8 hours a day — a number inherited from Robert Owen's nineteenth-century campaign for "eight hours labour, eight hours recreation, eight hours rest" — and reflexively treats the recreation slot as Netflix-shaped. Smith argues this is a misreading of the slot. "Me time" is not relaxation time by definition; it's time to spend on whatever your own goals actually are. For someone who genuinely wants to build, redirecting even a fraction of that block toward making compounds quickly.nnWe picked this because it is one of the more honest correctives to a culture that romanticises burning the boats — useful for anyone with a side project and a guilty conscience about not being braver. The disconcerting question Smith leaves you with is whether the boat you keep threatening to burn might actually be the platform that lets you build.
We curate the internet's most interesting articles — science, psychology, history, philosophy and more. Always free, no algorithm.